Advertisements


Donations Appreciated


  • Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Copyright


  • All contents
    ©Katherine Prouty

    Permission to republish online is granted on the condition that you provide and cite the web address, the author name, and notify me where it has been published.

February 07, 2005

The Superbowl

A great family event!

I think Mickey Kaus from Kausfiles summed up what was most disturbing about last year's Superbowl, which I viewed with four pre-teen and teenage girls and my son, then 7:

It's Not the Nipple: A Super Sunday reminder to Frank Rich and other righteous anti-FCCers: The big problem with last year's Janet Jackson/Justin Timberlake halftime show was not that people saw Jackson's breast. It wasn't what Jackson did that was offensive. It was what Timberlake did. Here was a massively popular, relatively hip singer whose message was that it was a hip, transgressive thing for men to rip clothes off women when they feel like it (which is quite often). I watched the game with a group of non-evangelical, non-moralistic dads who were uniformly horrified. The problem for them wasn't sex--their kids see flesh all the time in videos--but a form of sexism, not prudery but piggishness. Surely there are some types of behavior--homophobia, perhaps, or racism, or Republicanism--that even Frank Rich wouldn't want implicitly endorsed during a telecast watched by most of the country's teens and pre-teens. Yet the press has effectively recast this complicated issue as an uncomplicated case of "Nipple-gate," of blue-noses overreacting to the sight of a breast. No wonder red staters respond negatively when New Yorkers call them simplistic. ...

I went out of my way to counsel the girls that it was not OK for a guy to take off a girl's blouse. And it was the talk of the school for at least a week afterwards.